Search for: All records

Assessing student responses is a critical task in adaptive educational systems. More specifically, automatically evaluating students' self-explanations contributes to understanding their knowledge state which is needed for personalized instruction, the crux of adaptive educational systems. To facilitate the development of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning models for automated assessment of learners' self-explanations, annotated datasets are essential. In response to this need, we developed the SelfCode2.0 corpus, which consists of 3,019 pairs of student and expert explanations of Java code snippets, each annotated with semantic similarity, correctness, and completeness scores provided by experts. Alongside the dataset, we also provide performance results obtained with several baseline models based on TF-IDF and Sentence-BERT vectorial representations. This work aims to enhance the effectiveness of automated assessment tools in programming education and contribute to a better understanding and supporting student learning of programming. 

This paper presents a comparison of two instructional strategies meant to help learners better comprehend code and learn programming concepts: reading code examples annotated with expert explanation (worked-out examples) versus scaffolded self-explanation of code examples using an automated system (Intelligent Tutoring System). A randomized controlled trial study was conducted with 90 university students who were assigned to either the control group (reading worked-out examples, a passive strategy) or the experimental group where participants were asked to self-explain and received help, if needed, in the form of questions from the tutoring system( scaffolded self-explanation, an interactive strategy). We found that students with low prior knowledge in the experimental condition had significantly higher learning gains than students with high prior knowledge. However, in the control condition, this distinction in learning outcomes based on prior knowledge was not observed. We also analyzed the effect of self-efficacy on learning gains and the nature of self-explanation. Low self-efficacy students learn almost twice as much in the interactive condition versus the passive condition although the difference was not significant probably because of low sample size. We also found that high self-efficacy students tend to provide more relational explanations whereas low self-efficacy students provide more multi-structural or line-by-line explanations. 

This paper systematically investigates the generation of code explanations by Large Language Models (LLMs) for code examples commonly encountered in introductory programming courses. Our findings reveal significant variations in the nature of code explanations produced by LLMs, influenced by factors such as the wording of the prompt, the specific code examples under consideration, the programming language involved, the temperature parameter, and the version of the LLM. However, a consistent pattern emerges for Java and Python, where explanations exhibit a Flesch-Kincaid readability level of approximately 7-8 grade and a consistent lexical density, indicating the proportion of meaningful words relative to the total explanation size. Additionally, the generated explanations consistently achieve high scores for correctness, but lower scores on three other metrics: completeness, conciseness, and specificity. 

Worked examples, which present an explained code for solving typical programming problems are among the most popular types of learning content in programming classes. Most approaches and tools for presenting these examples to students are based on line-by-line explanations of the example code. However, instructors rarely have time to provide explanations for many examples typically used in a programming class. In this paper, we assess the feasibility of using LLMs to generate code explanations for passive and active example exploration systems. To achieve this goal, we compare the code explanations generated by chatGPT with the explanations generated by both experts and students. 

The ability to automatically assess learners' activities is the key to user modeling and personalization in adaptive educational systems.The work presented in this paper opens an opportunity to expand the scope of automated assessment from traditional programming problems to code comprehension tasks where students are requested to explain the critical steps of a program. The ability to automatically assess these self-explanations offers a unique opportunity to understand the current state of student knowledge, recognize possible misconceptions, and provide feedback. Annotated datasets are needed to train Artificial Intelligence/Machine Learning approaches for the automated assessment of student explanations. To answer this need, we present a novel corpus called SelfCode which consists of 1,770 sentence pairs of student and expert self-explanations of Java code examples, along with semantic similarity judgments provided by experts. We also present a baseline automated assessment model that relies on textual features. The corpus is available at the GitHub repository (https://github.com/jeevanchaps/SelfCode).